Legal information, not legal advice · Every entry verified to its primary source · Independent of any bar association
The Legal AI Compliance Register

legalaicompliance.help · est. 2026 · honest labels, primary sources, public changelog

Changelog

Every change to the tracker is recorded here with a date: new instruments, corrections, and re-verifications. Freshness you can audit, not just a "last updated" badge. Subscribe by RSS or email alert to get changes the week they ship.

2026-06-10: Watching: California proposed AI rule amendments

COPRAC's proposed amendments to Rules 1.1, 1.4, 1.6, 3.3, 5.1, and 5.3 finished public comment May 4, 2026. If adopted, these would be the first binding state disciplinary rules written specifically for AI. Listed as proposed, not law.

2026-06-10: Tracker launched with 32 verified instruments

Initial dataset: 16 formal ethics opinions (including ABA Formal Opinion 512), 10 guidance documents, 3 reports, 2 court rules/policies, and 1 pending rule proposal, every entry verified against its primary source. Honest labeling distinguishes formal opinions from guidance, reports, and court rules.

2026-06-10: New York 22 NYCRR Part 161 in effect

New York's system-wide court rule on AI use took effect June 1, 2026. It is permissive: no system-wide disclosure duty, with an optional Appendix A certification model rule for individual courts. Tracker entry and the court-disclosure explainer updated.

For licensed attorneys and firm operators. This site is legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney-client relationship is formed by using it. Rules change; verify against the primary sources linked on every page and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction before acting.